A New Four-valued Approach to Modal Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper several systems of modal logic based on four-valued matrices are presented. We start with pure modal logics, i.e. modal logics with modal operators as the only operators, using the Polish framework of structural consequence relation. We show that with a four-valued matrix we can define modal operators which have the same behavior as in pure S5 (S5 with only modal operators). We then present modal logics with conjunction and disjunction based on four-valued matrices. We show that if we use partial order instead of linear order, we are avoiding Łukasiewicz’s paradox. We then introduce classical negation and we show than defining implication in the usual way using negation and disjunction Kripke law is valid using either linear or partial order. On the other hand we show that the difference between linear and partial order appears at the level of the excluded middle and the replacement theorem.
منابع مشابه
Four-valued modal logic: Kripke semantics and duality
We introduce a family of modal expansions of Belnap-Dunn four-valued logic and related systems, and interpret them in many-valued Kripke structures. Using algebraic logic techniques and topological duality for modal algebras, and generalizing the so-called twist-structure representation, we axiomatize by means of Hilbert-style calculi the least modal logic over the four-element Belnap lattice a...
متن کاملOn a Four-Valued Modal Logic with Deductive Implication
In this paper we propose to enrich the four-valued modal logic associated to Monteiro’s Tetravalent modal algebras (TMAs) with a deductive implication, that is, such that the Deduction Meta–theorem holds in the resulting logic. All this lead us to establish some new connections between TMAs, symmetric (or involutive) Boolean algebras, and modal algebras for extensions of S5, as well as their lo...
متن کاملOn Lukasiewicz's Four-Valued Modal Logic
à Lukasiewicz’s four-valued modal logic is surveyed and analyzed, together with à Lukasiewicz’s motivations to develop it. A faithful interpretation of it into classical (non-modal) two-valued logic is presented, and some consequences are drawn concerning its classification and its algebraic behaviour. Some counter-intuitive aspects of this logic are discussed under the light of the presented r...
متن کاملPropositional dynamic logic with Belnapian truth values
We introduce BPDL, a combination of propositional dynamic logic PDL with the basic four-valued modal logic BK studied by Odintsov and Wansing (‘Modal logics with Belnapian truth values’, J. Appl. Non-Class. Log. 20, 279–301 (2010)). We modify the standard arguments based on canonical models and filtration to suit the four-valued context and prove weak completeness and decidability of BPDL.
متن کاملParaconsistent logic from a modal viewpoint
In this paper we study paraconsistent negation as a modal operator, considering the fact that the classical negation of necessity has a paraconsistent behavior. We examine this operator on the one hand in the modal logic S5 and on the other hand in some new four-valued modal logics. 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.
متن کامل